CLASSICAL AND MODERN HADITH TAKHRIJ METHODS: (A Comparative Study of Procedures and Methodological Characteristics)

Panji Anugrah; Imam Nugraha

doi:10.37397/al-majaalis.v13i2.1411

Authors

Panji Anugrah Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
Imam Nugraha Islamic University of Madinah Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37397/al-majaalis.v13i2.1411

Keywords:

hadits takhrij, classical methods, modern methods, comparative study, hadits studies

Abstract

Hadith takhrij is a fundamental methodological process in hadith studies aimed at tracing the sources of transmission and assessing the reliability of both sanad and matan. The evolution of digital technology in recent decades has significantly influenced the practice of hadith takhrij and raised methodological questions concerning the continuity and transformation of classical approaches. This article addresses the main question of how classical and modern methods of hadith takhrij compare in terms of their procedures and methodological characteristics. Within the framework of the study of hadith scientific methodology, this research employs a qualitative library-based approach by examining classical hadith literature and contemporary academic works on digital takhrij. The discussion is conducted through a comparative analysis focusing on procedural similarities, methodological differences, and patterns of continuity and evolution between classical and modern approaches. The results imply that both methods share the same epistemological foundation in the verification of sanad and matan, while differing in operational tools and efficiency. The study argues that modern hadith takhrij does not replace classical methodology but serves as a complementary technical development. The integration of classical analytical rigor with digital efficiency provides significant added value by minimizing technical-instrumental errors in contemporary hadith verification while preserving scholarly accuracy and methodological reliability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A’thoina, Inna, Farah Hasballah, and Nur Aisyah Fadillah. “Bridging Revelation and Algorithm.” Digital Muslim Review 3, no. 1 (2025): 40–57. https://doi.org/10.32678/dmr.v3i1.38.

Abdurrahman. “Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan Dalam Pendidikan Islam. Adabuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran.” Adabuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran 3, no. 2 (2024): 102–13. https://doi.org/10.38073/adabuna.v3i2.1563.

Akbar, Dzulfikar, and Puspita Handayani. “Tracing the Quality of the Sanad in Hadith Learning Using Al-Maktabah Al-Shāmilah Application.” Procedia of Social Sciences and Humanities 5 (2024): 42–51. https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v5i.490.

Al-Kitany, Muhammad bin Abi al-Faidh. Al-Risalah Al-Mustathrifah Li Bayani Masyhur Kutub Al-Sunnah Al-Musyrifah. Dar al-Basyair al-Islamiyyah, 2000.

Al-Suda’i, Abu Amr Nuruddin. Al-Bahtsu Al-Syamil Fi Al-Lum Al-Syar’iyyah Al-Gayah Wa Al-Wasail Qismal-Hadits Wa Al-Riwayah Wa Al-‘Atsar. Yaman, 2022.

Al-Suyuthy, Jalaluddin. Al-Bahru Alladzi Zakhara Fi Syarh Alfiyah Al-Atsar. Madinah: t.t., 1431.

Al-Syayi’, Abdul Aziz. Takhrij Al-Hadits. Dar al-Malikiyyah Linnasyr, 2019.

Al-Thahan, Mahmud. Ushul Al-Takhrij Wa Dirasah Al-Asanid. Riyadh: Maktab al-Ma’arif Nats wa al-Tauzi’, 1416.

Alisa, Nur Alisa, Prades Ariato Silondae, Muhammad Amin Sahib, Abdul Rahman Sakka, and Nur Asiah Asiah. “Menilik Metode Takhrij Hadis Manual Dan Digital.” El-Maqra’: Tafsir, Hadis Dan Teologi 3, no. 2 (2023): 35–45. https://doi.org/10.31332/elmaqra.v3i2.6460.

Aulia, Annisa Rahma, Nurul Amelia Harahap, Idris Siregar, Liwardha Simangungsong, and Salman. “Menilai Ulang Objektivitas Takhrīj Al-Ḥadīṡ : Antara Klaim Metode Ilmiah Dan Bias Ideologis.” Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains., Sosial, Dan Multidisiplin 1, no. 4 (2025): 357–68. https://garuda.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/documents/detail/5910290.

Darwis, Burhanuddin. Metodologi Takhrij Hadits. Makassar: Alauddin University Press, 2013.

Ellias, Mohd.Sobri, Mohammad Naim Fikri, Mohd Asyran, and Mohd Haidhar. “The Critical Thinking in Takhrij Al-Hadits: A Methodological Approach.” Journal of Hadtis Studies 10, no. 1 (2025): 16–32. https://journalofhadith.usim.edu.my/index.php/johs/article/view/344.

F.M., Othman, Jamani, Amran, Ariffin, and Yabe. “Methods of Takhrij Al-Hadith Teaching and Learning in Public Higher Education Institution.” International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Wducarion & Development 13, no. 1 (2024): 2124–34. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i1/20617.

Ghifari, Muhammad. “The Validity Of Hadith Data In The Practice Of Takhrij Al-Hadith Using ChatGPT.” Islamic Texts: Journal of Tafsir and Hadith Studies 1, no. 1 (2025): 53–61. https://doi.org/10.51875/islamictexts.v1i1.841.

Haqq, Z I, S Khalik, and L I Ahmad. “Transformasi Metode Takhrij Al-Hadis Di Era Digital (Studi Analisis Kritis Terhadap Integrasi Teknologi Dalam Studi Hadis).” Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin 3, no. 6 (2025): 387–401. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15874070.

Haqq, Zidny Iranal, SUbehan Khalik, and La Ode Ismail Ahmad. “Transformasi Metode Takhrij Al-Hadis Di Era Digital (Studi Analisis Kritis Terhadap Integrasi Teknologi Dalam Studi Hadis).” Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin 3, no. 6 (2025): 387–401. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15874070.

Ismail, Mohd Yusuf. “The Writing of Takhrij Al-Hadits Sudies: An Integrative Methodological Survey for the Usul Al-Takhrij Genre.” Journal of Hadits Studies 10, no. 2 (2025): 209–22. https://doi.org/10.33102/johs.v10i2.403.

Khalid Bahrudin, Mohamad, Ishak Suliaman, Mohamad Azrien, and Mohamed Adnan. “Systematic Literature Review on Hadith Authentication Between Year 2000 to 2021 [Tinjauan Literatur Sistematik Berkaitan Pengautentikasian Hadith Dari Tahun 2000 Hingga 2021].” HADIS 13, no. 25 (2023): 55–69. https://doi.org/10.53840/hadis.v13i25.218.

Khoirurrizal, Rozika. “Hadis Tentang Menjamak Salat Tanpa Uzur: Studi ‘Ilal Dan Mukhtalif Al-Hadis.” Al-Majaalis: Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah 12, no. 2 (2025): 342–68. https://doi.org/10.37397/al-majaalis.v12i2.843.

Mawaddah, Annisa. “Research Methodology of Takhrij Hadith.” Taqriri: Journal of Al-Hadith Science Studies 1, no. 2 (2025): 85–103. https://doi.org/10.61166/taqriri.v1i2.10.

Miftachurrozaq, Tahmid, Jannatul Husna, and Waharjani. “Ilmu Hadis Perspektif Mohammad Hashim Kamali Dalam A Textbook of Hadith Studies.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin 21, no. 2 (2022): 175–89. https://doi.org/10.18592/jiiu.v21i2.7160.

Muzakkky, Althaf Husein, and Muhammad Mundzir. “Ragam Metode Takhrij Hadis : Dari Era Tradisional Hingga Digital.” Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantra 4, no. 1 (2022): 74–87. https://syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/jshn/article/download/11146/4609.

Najiyah, Nurlaili Nabilah Nazahah, and Ahmad Hadi. “Digitalisasi Kajian Sanad Hadis : Takhrij Dan I ’ Tibar Sanad Dengan Software Gawāmi ’ Al-Kalim.” Al-Bayan: Journal of Hadits Studies 2, no. 1 (2023): 51–75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382799473_DIGITALISASI_KAJIAN_SANAD_HADIS_TAKHRIJ_DAN_I’TIBAR_SANAD_DENGAN_SOFTWARE_GAWAMI’_AL-KALIM.

Nasir, M. Ridwan. Metode Takhrij Al-Hadits Dan Penelitian Sanad Hadits. Surabya: IMTIYAZ, 2015.

Nur’aini, Luthfi Hidayah. “The Use of Digital Technology in Hadith Studies.” At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 7, no. 1 (2025): 12–23. https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v7i1.864.

Nurhamidin, Budi, Sabil Mokodenseho, Haslinda Mokodompit, Amaludin Bahansubu, and Prasetio Rumondor. “Transformasi Otoritas Keagamaan Di Era Digital, Analisis Sosiologis Terhadap Pergeseran Pola Otoritas Ulama Di Media Sosial.” Journal of Educational and Religious Perspectives 1, no. 1 (2025): 39–48.

Puyu, Darsul S. Metode Takhrij Hadits Menurut Kosa Kata, Tematik Dan CD Hadits. Makassar: Alauddin University Press, 2012.

Silviantoro, Noor Ikhsan. “Noor Ikhsan Silviantoro, “Telaah Metodologi Penyahihahan Ibnu Hibban Terhadap Hadis ((اقْرَؤُوا عَلَى مَوتَاكُم يس)).” Al-Majaalis: Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah 6, no. 2 (2019): 81–112. https://doi.org/10.37397/almajaalis.v6i2.115.

Sobri, Mohd, Mohamad Naim, Mohd Asyran, Pengajian Quran, Universiti Sains, Akademi Pengajian, and Islam Kontemporari. “The Critical Thinking In Takhrij Al- Hadith : A Methodological Approach.” Journal of Hadtits Studies 10, no. 1 (2025): 16–32. https://journalofhadith.usim.edu.my/index.php/johs/article/view/344.

Solihin, Firman, and Yusuf Rahman. “The Discourse of E-Research in Hadith: Practices And Critiques of Hadith Sanad Research Using Al-Maktabah Al-Syāmilah And Jawāmi’ Al-Kalim Software.” Journal Of Hadith Studies 10, no. 1 (2025): 23–41. https://journalofhadith.usim.edu.my/index.php/johs/article/view/356.

Sudarmin, Sudarmin, Muhammad Ali, and M Asyraf Mubarak Sudarmin. “Metodologi Takhrīj Berdasarkan Tema Hadis Serta Contoh Aplikatifnya.” JAWAMI’UL KALIM: Jurnal Kajian Hadis 2, no. 2 (2024): 79–93. https://doi.org/10.36701/jawamiulkalim.v2i2.1413.

Teknologi, Saltanera. “Ensiklopedia Hadis-Apps on Google Play,” n.d. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.saltanera.hadits.

Umam, Khaerul. “Jami Al-Kutub Al-Tis’ah Application: Solution to Resolving Takhrij Al-Hadith and Implications for Hadith Students.” In Procedding International COnference on Religion,Science and Education, 4:207–14, 2025. https://sunankalijaga.org/prosiding/index.php/icrse/article/view/1466.

Wadjedy, Muh Farid, and Muhammad Ali. “Takhrij Al Hadis.” MAHAD ALY JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC STUDIES 4, no. 1 (2025): 149–70. https://doi.org/10.63398/4x7kyv50.

Widyasari, Susi, Rismalia Sari, and Aahmad Hadi Wiyono. “Historisitas Metode Tahrij Hadist Digital.” SAMAWAT: Journal Of Hadith and Qur’anic Studies 4, no. 1 (2020). https://www.ejournal.badrussholeh.ac.id/index.php/samawat/article/view/206.

Zaindina, Rani, and Isnaini Lu’lu’Atim Muthoharoh. “Upaya Menjaga Hadis Dari Pemalsuan: Perspektif Abi Al-Hasan Ibn ‘Ali Ibn Muhammad Ibn ‘Irāq Al-Kinānī.” Al-Majaalis: Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah 12, no. 2 (2025): 409–34. https://doi.org/10.37397/al-majaalis.v12i2.792.