ḌAʿĪF JIDDAN VS. MAWḌŪʿ: A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ḤADĪTH BY IBN AL-JAWZĪ IN AL-MAWḌŪʿĀT AND AL-ʿIRĀQĪ IN AL-MUGHNĪ ʿAN ḤAML AL-ASFĀR FĪ AL-ASFĀR

Marwan Mas'ud; Imam Ghazali Said; Mohammed Alghiffar Alwalid

doi:10.37397/al-majaalis.v13i1.1130

Penulis

Marwan Mas'ud Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Imam Ghazali Said Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Mohammed Alghiffar Alwalid Universiti Islam Antarbangsa Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37397/al-majaalis.v13i1.1130

Kata Kunci:

al-‘Iraqi, AL-MUGHNĪ ʿAN ḤAML AL-ASFĀR FĪ AL-ASFĀR, Ibn al-Jawzi, al-Mawḍū‘āt

Abstrak

This study explores the methodological differences in ḥadīth classification between al-ʿIrāqī and Ibn al-Jawzī, prompted by the broader discourse on the authenticity of Islamic traditions. The research primarily compares five aḥādīth judged as ḍaʿīf jiddan by al-ʿIrāqī and as mawḍūʿ by Ibn al-Jawzī, focusing on their distinct approaches in evaluating isnād and matn. A secondary focus lies in examining al-ʿIrāqī’s precision in takhrīj and isnād analysis versus Ibn al-Jawzī’s critical stance toward unreliable transmitters and implausible texts. This qualitative, descriptive-comparative study adopts a library-based approach and deductive reasoning, relying on primary and secondary sources within the discipline of jarḥ wa-taʿdīl. The research aims to determine which scholar's assessment aligns more accurately with the standards of ḥadīth criticism. The findings reveal that one narration concerning the virtue of bread is more appropriately classified as ḍaʿīf jiddan, while the remaining four about ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb’s virtues, curbing desires, bringing goods from the market, and generosity are best regarded as mawḍūʿ. These results highlight the richness of the ḥadīth critical tradition and affirm that ḥadīth authority in Islam must rest on rigorous scholarly verification, balancing both isnād reliability and matn coherence.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Adlini, Miza Nina, Anisya Hanifa Dinda, Sarah Yulinda, Octavia Chotimah, and Sauda Julia Merliyana. “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka.” Jurnal Edumaspul 6, no. 1 (2022): 974–80.

Al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad ibn Ismā‘īl. Al-Tārīkh al-Kabīr. 1st ed. Edited by Muḥammad ibn Ṣāliḥ ibn Muḥammad al-Dabbāsī and Markaz Shadhā lil-Buḥūth under the supervision of Maḥmūd ibn ‘Abd al-Fattāḥ al-Naḥḥāl. Riyadh: Al-Nāshir al-Mutamayyiz lil-Ṭibā‘ah wa al-Nashr wa al-Tawzī‘, 2019.

Al-Dhahabī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Mīzān al-I‘tidāl fī Naqd al-Rijāl. 1st ed. Edited by ‘Alī Muḥammad al-Bajāwī. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Ma‘rifah lil-Ṭibā‘ah wa al-Nashr, 1963.

Al-’Irāqī, ’Abd al-Raḥīm ibn al-Ḥusayn. Al-Mughnī “an Ḥaml al-Asfār Fī al-Asfār, Fī Takhrij mā fī al-Iḥyā” min al-Akhbār. 1st ed. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 2005.

Altammami, Shatha Hamad. “Artificial Intelligence for Understanding the Hadith.” PhD Thesis, University of Leeds, 2023.

Anwar, Pajar, and Sri Minarti. “Metodologi Ulumul Hadits.” Fatih: Journal of Contemporary Research 2, no. 2 (2025): 612–22. https://doi.org/10.61253/7ytxq209.

Aziz, Hafiz Fahad, and Mr Ghulam Qasim. “Exploring the Interplay between Hadith and Islamic Theology: Foundations, Impacts, and Interpretations.” Journal of Religion and Society 3, no. 02 (2025): 846–59.

Azungah, Theophilus. “Qualitative Research: Deductive and Inductive Approaches to Data Analysis.” Qualitative Research Journal 18, no. 4 (November 2018): 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035.

Fikri, Shofil, Fiimaratus Sholihah, Jasminta Murawah Hayyu, Alqodhi Adlantama, and Muhammad Hanan Ali. “Memahami Makna dari Hadis dan Ilmu Hadis menurut Pandangan Muhadditsin dan Ushuliyyin.” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 1, no. 4 (2024): 12–12.

Ghazālī, Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad al-. Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm Al-Dīn. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifah, n.d.

Gufran-ul-Haque, Muhammad. “Ḥadīth of Self-Knowing between Sufis and Ḥadīth Scholars.” ISLAMIC INSIGHT 7, no. 2 (2024).

Hafidz, Abdul. “Kritik Ulama Hadits: Ilmu Jarh wa Ta’dil sebagai Upaya dalam Menjaga Orisinalitas Hadits.” International Conference on Islamic Studies 1, no. 1 (2020): 152–62.

Hasanah, Ananda Nurul. “Penerapan Syarat Kesahihan Hadis pada Skripsi Mahasiswa Prodi Ilmu Hadis UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Tahun 2024.” B.S. thesis, Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, n.d.

Https://Yaqeeninstitute.Org.My/Read/Paper/Authenticating-Hadith-and-the-History-of-Hadith-Criticism?Utm_source=chatgpt.Com#ftnt22.

Ibn al-Jawzī, ‘Abd al-Raḥmān ibn ‘Alī. al-Ḍu‘Afā’ wa al-Matrūkūn. 1st ed. Edited by ‘Abd Allāh al-Qāḍī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1986.

———. al-Mawḍū‘āt. 1st ed. Edited by ‘Abd al-Raḥmān Muḥammad ‘Uthmān. Al-Madīnah al-Munawwarah: Muḥammad ‘Abd al-Muḥsin, Ṣāḥib al-Maktabah al-Salafīyah, 1966.

Ibn Muhammad Yusoff, Muhammad Fawwaz. “Ibn Ḥibbān Al-Bustī’s (d. 354/965) Contribution to the Science of Ḥadīth Transmission.” PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow, 2017.

Imron, Ali. “Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Jarh wa Ta’dil.” Mukaddimah: Jurnal Studi Islam 2, no. 2 (2017): 287–302. https://doi.org/10.14421/mjsi.22.1371.

Karagözoğlu, Mustafa Macit. “Contested Avenues in Post-Classical Sunni Ḥadīth Criticism: A Reading through the Lens of al-Mughnī ʿan al-Ḥifẓ wa-l-Kitāb.” Journal of Islamic Studies 29, no. 2 (2018): 149–80. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020092.

Kurdian, Nur Kholis Bin, Abd A’la, and Muhammad Syarifudin. “Kritik Israr Ahmad Khan Terhadap Hadis-Hadis Kitab al-Qadar dari Kitab Sahih al-Bukhari.” Al-Majaalis: Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah 12, no. 1 (2024): 121–40. https://doi.org/10.37397/al-majaalis.v12i1.678.

Mohajan, Haradhan Kumar. “Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects.” Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People 7, no. 1 (2018): 23–48.

Muhid, Muhid. “Ilmu Kritik Hadis (al-Jarh wa al-Ta’dil) dalam Lintasan Sejarah.” Dar El-Ilmi: Jurnal Studi Keagamaan, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora 6, no. 2 (2019): 338–62. https://doi.org/10.52166/dar%20el-ilmi.v6i2.1742.

Nawaz, Muhammad. “Understanding Tadlīs: A Key Concept in the Science of Ḥadīth Criticism.” Al-Marjān (المرجان) 2, no. 3 (2024): 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1234/6mvsqw31.

Nurrohman, Muhamad Ridwan. “Metodologi Tajrih Ibn al-Jauzi dalam Kitab ad-Dhu’afâ wal-Matrûkîn (Bedah Kasus Riwayat Aflah Ibn Sa’id dalam Kitab al-Maudhû’ât).” Al-Majaalis: Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah 4, no. 2 (2017): 73–90. https://doi.org/10.37397/almajaalis.v4i2.66.

Qudsy, Saifuddin Zuhri, Irwan Abdullah, Hasse Jubba, Zaenuddin Hudi Prasojo, and Egi Tanadi Taufik. “The Making of Living Ḥadīth: A New Direction of Ḥadīth Studies in Indonesia.” Culture and Religion 23, no. 4 (2023): 353–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2024.2336461.

Rajani, Kumail. Making Sense of Ismaili Traditions: The Modes and Meanings of the Transmission of Ḥadīth in the Works of al-Qāḍī al-Nuʿmān (d. 363/974). University of Exeter, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2024.2336461.

Ramle, Muhamad Rozaimi, and Miftachul Huda. “Between Text and Context: Understanding Ḥadīth through Asbab al Wurud.” Religions 13, no. 2 (2022): 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020092.

Rohman, A’an Mujibur. “Kritik Ibn al-Jauzi terhadap Hadis dalam Kitab Ihya Ulum ad-Din dan Pembelaan Abu al-Fadl al-Iraqi.” Jalsah: The Journal of Al-Quran and As-Sunnah Studies 1, no. 1 (2021): 62–75.

Taufik, Alwi, Juli Handoko, and Ihsan Mustofa. “Ilmu Hadits sebagai Pilar Keaslian Ajaran Islam: Kajian Kritik Sanad dan Matan.” Molang: Journal Islamic Education 3, no. 1 (2025): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.32806/tb6bp948.

Tohardi, Dr Ahmad. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Sosial + Plus. Tanjungpura University Press, 2019.

Tujang, Bisri. “al-Nasikh wa al-Mansukh (Deskripsi Metode Interpretasi Hadis Kontradiktif).” Al-Majaalis: Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah 2, no. 2 (2015): 69–98. https://doi.org/10.37397/almajaalis.v2i2.28.

Utama, I. Gusti Bagus Rai, Ni Made Eka Mahadewi, and Ni Putu Dyah Krismawintari. Metodologi Penelitian Bidang Manajemen dan Pariwisata (dilengkapi Studi Kasus Penelitian dan Pembahasannya). Deepublish, 2023.

Widodo, Heru, and Fahmi Irfanudin. “al Jarh wa at-Ta’dil in Researching Sanad Hadits.” Journal of Hadith Studies 3, no. 1 (2020): 23–33.

Wijaya, Dina Sakinah, and Nurul Fitri Habibah. “Periwayatan Hadis Nabi (Tahammul wal Ada’), Ilmu Jarh wa Ta’dil dan Ilmu Nasikh Mansukh dalam Hadis.” El-Sunnah: Jurnal Kajian Hadis Dan Integrasi Ilmu 5, no. 1 (2024): 23–32.

Zubaidillah, Muh Haris. Ilmu Jarh Wa Ta’dil. OSF, 2018. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/y8wt6.