دراسة حديث «لا ضرر ولا ضرار» كمستند شرعيّ لفتوى مجلس العلماء الإندونيسيّ بجاوا الشرقية في تحريم ساوند هوريغ (sound horeg)

Abstract

This study analyzes the status of the hadith narrated by Al-Hakim in Al-Mustadrak number 2345 regarding the principle of "lā ḍarara wa lā dhirār," which serves as the theological basis for the East Java MUI Fatwa prohibiting "Sound Horeg." The study focuses on testing the sanad validity through the takhrij method, tracing scholars' practices in legal reasoning (istidlal), and examining its fiqh implications for contemporary social phenomena. Using a qualitative-descriptive approach, this research traces transmission paths, evaluates the dialectic between mursal and muttashil narrations, and verifies the evidence's strength as legal proof. The analysis extends to the fatwa's substance, reviewed through derivative fiqh maxims and international fatwa comparisons. The results indicate that although Al-Hakim's path sparks debate regarding its chain, the hadith cumulatively attains the status of Hasan li Ghayrihi due to supporting mutaba'āt and syawāhid, rendering it valid as a legal basis. From a fiqh perspective, the MUI fatwa rests on two substantial pillars: protection against physical harm to health and property, and prevention of moral corruption due to illicit mixing (ikhtilāṭ) and associated negative excesses. This position holds global relevance, aligning with loudspeaker restriction policies in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan, affirming that the prohibition of "Sound Horeg" is a legitimate preventive measure to maintain public order.

Keywords: Sound Horeg, MUI Fatwa, lā ḍarara wa lā dhirār, Hadith Takhrij.